January 30, 2025

JUST IN: San Francisco is considering a bill that would let the…

When the managers of the Safeway grocery at Bush and Larkin Streets in San

Francisco announced in 1984 that the store would be closing permanently

within the next week, it left the locals with few options for where to buy fresh

groceries. As a result, the Neighborhood Grocery Protection Act was established by the city’s Board of Supervisors. It mandates that supermarkets

give six months’ notice before shutting and pledge to hold sincere talks with

local residents.

In San Francisco, an uncannily similar scenario is unfolding forty years later.

Another Safeway announced its closure in January; this one was located at

Webster and Ellis, in a predominantly Black neighborhood that is frequented

by older residents. Community people protested about this, and two city

supervisors—Dean Preston and Aaron Peskin—introduced the Neighborhood

Grocery Protection Act again as a result.

Preston stated in a statement, “It was a fantastic idea in 1984, and it’s an even

greater one now.” When big neighborhood grocery stores intend to close, our

communities deserve to know, a chance to be heard, and a plan for transition.

Enormous corporate companies cannot be allowed to make unilateral, behind-

the-scenes choices about how to provide food security for our elders and

families.

The suggestion is made in the midst of a major company and resident

migration from San Francisco. Nearly 40 retail establishments have closed in

Union Square, a significant commercial center in the center of San Francisco’s

downtown, since the pandemic, and dozens more have closed in the

neighborhood, according to a 2023 CNN story. Experts attribute the large

exodus to a variety of factors, including a decline in tourism, an increase in

crime, and a decrease in the demand for commercial real estate in an era of

remote work.

Nonetheless, San Francisco is not the only city facing the challenge of ensuring

that the most vulnerable citizens have access to community groceries and can

continue to do so. If the Neighborhood Grocery Protection Act is successful, it

would establish an intriguing precedent in the ongoing national effort to

combat food insecurity.

“Supermarket closures can have an especially dire impact on senior citizens,

people with disabilities and people who lack the means to travel by car or

public transportation to supermarkets outside the neighborhood,” the

ordinance says. “To safeguard the interests of workers, including the

employees of some supermarkets, federal and state laws require large

businesses to notify their employees of their intent to close or transfer

ownership of the business.”

The writers of the ordinance state that “this Article 57 does not restrict the

owner from making such a decision.” However, an owner has a duty as an

essential member of the community to make a reasonable effort to collaborate

with neighborhood residents and the City to look into options for the

supermarket to stay open for business or to find a replacement, given the life-

sustaining services it provides to neighborhood residents and the significant

role it plays in strengthening and stabilizing the community it serves.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *